Seeded pre-pilot demo data: all Q2 and June–July records on authenticated screens are illustrative, not live research or participant records. The public pilot remains scheduled for 1 September–30 November 2026.
Hello Priya — the Q2 2026 period closes in 4 days
This dashboard shows measurement and reporting work only. Your role does not write learning content, sign off on clinical review, or open user records, so none of that appears here — not even greyed out.
Figures refresh nightly at 06:00 and cover the open period only.
A change request on the knowledge assessment is being held — on purpose
The content admin has asked to reword questions B-07 and B-14 of the assessment, on the grounds that they are hard to follow. The change cannot be applied to the open period: 41 people have already sat the baseline on version v1.2, and swapping the instrument part-way through would make the before-and-after comparison behind METRIC-01 meaningless. The request is queued for v1.3, from Q3 2026. Open question sets →
Outstanding this period
| Task | Metric | Status | Why it matters | Due | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Close Q2 2026 and generate the period snapshot | METRIC-07 | Waiting on you | Once closed, the period's figures can no longer be edited — that is what makes them worth comparing against later. | 31 Jul | Open metrics |
| Assemble the three-month pilot report for the Commission | METRIC-07 | Drafts on close | Due within 30 days of the pilot closing, with the public summary. It is built from the closed snapshot, so it cannot be started before the period is closed. | 30 Aug | Open the draft |
| Record the 9 people excluded from METRIC-01 for missing the endline window | METRIC-01 | Note required | Sample attrition has to be stated in the limitations block. It is never dropped quietly. | before close | Add to limitations |
| Review the survey wording for Q3 draft v2.1 |
METRIC-03 | Draft | Question 4 is double-barrelled (“are you betting less and feeling less stressed?”) — split it in two. | 1 Sep | Edit the survey |
| Two age bands below the minimum cohort size 35–44 (n=6) · 45+ (n=3) |
Privacy floor | Suppressed automatically | Applied by the system. There is no reveal control anywhere, including in exports. | — | No action available |
| 26 people declined the voluntary survey | METRIC-03 | Nothing to do | Declining is a valid answer. There is no reminder, and the invitation is not sent again. | — | No action available |
What your role can reach
The manage console is shared by every staff role, but it is built from the permissions of whoever is signed in. For an impact analyst that comes to five areas:
- Overview — this page.
- Pilot metrics — aggregate, de-identified figures for the open period.
- Question sets — the instruments themselves: the self-report survey and the knowledge assessment.
- Period snapshots — closed periods and their locked figures.
- Pilot report — what has been sent to the funding body, and what is due next.
Everything else is not rendered for your account. Typing an address by hand still returns a no-access page, because the check sits on the route and not on the menu.
- No search by person and no way to open an individual account. Behaviour logs are stored without identifiers.
- No retention target and no leaderboard set as a goal. In a gambling-harm tool, high retention can be a bad sign.
- No control to reveal a cohort under the minimum size, including for internal exports.
- No route for measurement data to feed back into gameplay: odds, rewards and notifications are never personalised from anything measured here.
- No way to void a closed period. A poor result stays on the record and is still published. See the closed periods →
These constraints are enforced in the product, not just written down in the protocol.